<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: South Park *Conservatives*??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfsmith.com/blog/2005/07/04/south-park-conservatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfsmith.com/blog/2005/07/04/south-park-conservatives/</link>
	<description>The dynamic new way to bore you with stories about what I watched on TV last night. Or stuff about Macs, libertarianism, prog rock, cockatiels, mountains, travel, science fiction, the Web, and what a totally awesome guy I would be if I were anything like I would like to think I am.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsmith.com/blog/2005/07/04/south-park-conservatives/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 22:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsmith.com/blog/?p=264#comment-586</guid>
		<description>My complaint is not that they originated the meme--clearly they're participating in the topical-news-that-just-happens-to-correspond-to-a-new-book-I'm-putting-out activity that passes for reporting now. My complaint is that they never brought up an alternative explanation for the fact that there's much to the show that ridicules bipartisan positions ("Drugs are bad, m'kay?"), conservative positions ("What do you mean you don't have sex with children, Father Maxi?"), and, of course, no-good goddamn dirty hippies ("Everyone knows that Cherokee hair makes the best tampons"). They have to be one or the other, despite the fact that On the Media has had guests from a certain magazine on:

&lt;a href="http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/transcripts_112803_momdad.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/transcripts_112803_momdad.html&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href="http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/transcripts_040204_nasty.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/transcripts_040204_nasty.html&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My complaint is not that they originated the meme&#8211;clearly they&#8217;re participating in the topical-news-that-just-happens-to-correspond-to-a-new-book-I&#8217;m-putting-out activity that passes for reporting now. My complaint is that they never brought up an alternative explanation for the fact that there&#8217;s much to the show that ridicules bipartisan positions (&#8221;Drugs are bad, m&#8217;kay?&#8221;), conservative positions (&#8221;What do you mean you don&#8217;t have sex with children, Father Maxi?&#8221;), and, of course, no-good goddamn dirty hippies (&#8221;Everyone knows that Cherokee hair makes the best tampons&#8221;). They have to be one or the other, despite the fact that On the Media has had guests from a certain magazine on:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/transcripts_112803_momdad.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/transcripts_112803_momdad.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/transcripts_040204_nasty.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/transcripts_040204_nasty.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Lefkowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsmith.com/blog/2005/07/04/south-park-conservatives/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Lefkowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 20:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsmith.com/blog/?p=264#comment-585</guid>
		<description>I don't think this is that outrageous of a discussion topic, since there's been a concerted effort from the Right over the last couple of years to add some hipness to their overwhelmingly white male Christian image by trumpeting the arrival of "South Park Republicans"/"South Park Conservatives".

See

&lt;a href="http://www.andrewsullivan.com/index.php?dish_inc=archives/2001_12_09_dish_archive.html#7873332" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.andrewsullivan.com/index.php?dish_inc=archives/2001_12_09_dish_archive.html#7873332&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href="http://www.techcentralstation.com/100702A.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.techcentralstation.com/100702A.html&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href="http://usconservatives.about.com/od/politics/a/southparkgop.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://usconservatives.about.com/od/politics/a/southparkgop.htm&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0895260190/ref=pd_sxp_f/102-6413098-1968953?v=glance&#038;s=books" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0895260190/ref=pd_sxp_f/102-6413098-1968953?v=glance&#038;s=books&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Park_Republican" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Park_Republican&lt;/a&gt;

So it's not that NPR or whoever is forcing Parker &#038; Stone into the "Republican" box -- rather, it's (at least some) Republicans who are doing that, more for their own benefit than because of any strong ideological connection.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this is that outrageous of a discussion topic, since there&#8217;s been a concerted effort from the Right over the last couple of years to add some hipness to their overwhelmingly white male Christian image by trumpeting the arrival of &#8220;South Park Republicans&#8221;/&#8221;South Park Conservatives&#8221;.</p>
<p>See</p>
<p><a href="http://www.andrewsullivan.com/index.php?dish_inc=archives/2001_12_09_dish_archive.html#7873332" rel="nofollow">http://www.andrewsullivan.com/index.php?dish_inc=archives/2001_12_09_dish_archive.html#7873332</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcentralstation.com/100702A.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcentralstation.com/100702A.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://usconservatives.about.com/od/politics/a/southparkgop.htm" rel="nofollow">http://usconservatives.about.com/od/politics/a/southparkgop.htm</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0895260190/ref=pd_sxp_f/102-6413098-1968953?v=glance&#038;s=books" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0895260190/ref=pd_sxp_f/102-6413098-1968953?v=glance&#038;s=books</a></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Park_Republican" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Park_Republican</a></p>
<p>So it&#8217;s not that NPR or whoever is forcing Parker &#038; Stone into the &#8220;Republican&#8221; box &#8212; rather, it&#8217;s (at least some) Republicans who are doing that, more for their own benefit than because of any strong ideological connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
